TDS Aid Station Planner
All 14 TDS checkpoints pre-loaded. Enter your goal finish time to get estimated arrival times at every aid station.
Full TDS (Sur les Traces des Ducs de Savoie) course data: aid stations, cutoffs, course profile
Enter a goal TDS finish time and get estimated arrival times at every checkpoint - 145 km with around 9,500 m of climbing, with crew and drop-bag points flagged.
Checkpoints (14)
About TDS (Sur les Traces des Ducs de Savoie)
TDS (Sur les Traces des Ducs de Savoie) covers 145 km with around 9,500 m of elevation gain, starting in Courmayeur, Italy. The overall cutoff is 44 hours 55 minutes.
Crew access is allowed at Lac Combal (16.4 km), La Thuile - Petit St Bernard (36.4 km), Bourg Saint-Maurice (50.6 km), Fort de la Platte (55.5 km), Cormet de Roselend (65.7 km), La Gittaz (73.3 km), Beaufort (91.9 km), Hauteluce (98.2 km), Le Signal (114.9 km), Les Contamines (122.7 km), Bellevue (136.5 km) and Les Houches (141 km). Drop bags are available at Beaufort.
Checkpoint data approximate - verify against the current official race guide at montblanc.utmb.world before your race.
The science behind km-effort pacing
Most runners build race pacing plans by dividing total distance evenly - which ignores the fact that an uphill kilometre takes far longer than a flat one. This planner uses TrailMath's enhanced km-effort model to distribute your goal time proportionally by effort, not by distance.
The km-effort formula for each segment is: distance_km + gain_m/100 + loss_m/150. This is TrailMath's extension of the standard ITRA gain-only formula, which adds descent cost based on Minetti's finding that steep technical descents carry real metabolic load. A 5km segment with 500m of gain and 200m of loss has an effort of 5 + 5 + 1.3 = 11.3 km-effort - equivalent to running 11.3km flat. Time is allocated proportionally to this effort score.
Why gain and loss have asymmetric costs. Minetti et al. (2002) mapped the metabolic cost of inclined locomotion across gradients from -45% to +45%. The key findings: metabolic cost rises steeply above 15-20% uphill grade, making power hiking more energy-efficient than running on steep climbs. On descents, eccentric muscle loading (quads acting as brakes) creates its own metabolic cost - steep technical descents are far more demanding than the same gradient on a smooth fire road. The gain/100 + loss/150 asymmetry in the formula reflects this - gain is more costly per metre than loss, but loss is not free.
Power hiking threshold is flagged at segments where your computed pace exceeds 12 min/km (19 min/mile). This threshold corresponds to the crossover point where walking biomechanics become more efficient than running on steep uphill terrain. Strategic power hiking on marked segments preserves leg muscle for descents and reduces overall race time compared to running everything.
This km-effort model is the same formula used in TrailMath's training engine for load calculation (following Dan Johnston's asymmetric elevation scoring methodology), ensuring consistency between how your training load is measured and how your race effort is planned.
Minetti AE et al. (2002). Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Physiol. 93(3):1039-46. Minetti AE et al. (1995). Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man. J Physiol. 481(Pt 1):235-43. ITRA. km-effort formula. International Trail Running Association. itra.run
Track your TDS plan, crew notes, and live progress in the app
TrailMath uses these models to build periodized plans adjusted to your goals and terrain.
Start free