Skip to content
TrailMath
Language EN FR
Mallorca by UTMB - ETM 56K

ETM 56K Aid Station Planner

All 7 ETM 56K checkpoints pre-loaded. Enter your goal finish time to get estimated arrival times at every aid station.

56km2,450m D+7 checkpointsCutoff: 12h

Full Mallorca by UTMB - ETM 56K course data: aid stations, cutoffs, course profile

Enter a goal ETM 56K finish time and get estimated arrival times at every checkpoint - 56 km with around 2,450 m of climbing, with crew and drop-bag points flagged.

Turns every arrival into a clock time and every cutoff into a margin.

Terrain changes how the goal time is shared between segments, not the total. One surface everywhere cancels out.

Checkpoints (7)

Cutoff Sat 10:00

Cutoff Sat 13:25

Cutoff Sat 17:00

Cutoff Sat 18:20

Cutoff Sat 20:00

Crew may meet you at

The organiser publishes no crew access anywhere on this course.

Drop bags

The organiser publishes no drop-bag service anywhere on this course.

  1. Lluc

    Sat 09:39

    Cutoff Sat 10:0021 minTight

    Leave by Sat 10:51Set by Cúber

    Dist (km)
    10.8
    D+ (m)
    +508
    Seg time
    1:39:18
    Seg pace/km
    9:13
  2. Cúber

    Sat 12:12

    Cutoff Sat 13:251h12

    Leave by Sat 14:12Set by Fornalutx

    Dist (km)
    25.4
    D+ (m)
    +864
    Seg time
    2:33:24
    Seg pace/km
    10:29
  3. Coll d'en Pomalikely hiking (pace)

    Sat 13:39

    Leave by Sat 15:39Set by Fornalutx

    Dist (km)
    32.3
    D+ (m)
    +573
    Seg time
    1:26:51
    Seg pace/km
    12:35
  4. Fornalutx

    Sat 15:00

    Cutoff Sat 17:001h60

    Leave by Sat 17:14Set by Sóller

    Dist (km)
    41.0
    D+ (m)
    +91
    Seg time
    1:20:42
    Seg pace/km
    9:15
  5. Sóller

    Sat 16:05

    Cutoff Sat 18:202h14

    Leave by Sat 18:58Set by Port de Sóller (Finish)

    Dist (km)
    48.9
    D+ (m)
    +180
    Seg time
    1:05:31
    Seg pace/km
    8:21
  6. Port de Sóller (Finish)

    Sat 17:07

    Cutoff Sat 20:002h53

    Dist (km)
    56.0
    D+ (m)
    +234
    Seg time
    1:01:13
    Seg pace/km
    8:36

Highlighted rows use a pace heuristic (>12 min/km / >19 min/mi) - likely hiking by speed, not grade. The grade-based power-hike cue is ≥15% (see GAP and Incline tools). Times are distributed proportionally by km-effort.

Leave by is the latest you can start the next segment and still make every cutoff ahead of you at this pace - often set by a station further on, not this one. It does not yet subtract the time you spend stopped, so treat it as the optimistic edge.

Cutoff buffers are estimates from your goal time and published barriers. Courses and barriers change - verify against the official race guide.

About Mallorca by UTMB - ETM 56K

Mallorca by UTMB - ETM 56K covers 56 km with around 2,450 m of elevation gain, starting in Selva, Spain. The overall cutoff is 12 hours.

Checkpoint data approximate - verify against the current official race guide at mallorca.utmb.world before your race.

The science behind km-effort pacing

Most runners build race pacing plans by dividing total distance evenly - which ignores the fact that an uphill kilometre takes far longer than a flat one. This planner uses TrailMath's enhanced km-effort model to distribute your goal time proportionally by effort, not by distance.

The km-effort formula for each segment is: distance_km + gain_m/100 + loss_m/200. This is TrailMath's extension of the standard ITRA gain-only formula (model TM1, where the descent divisor is a published convention), which adds descent cost because steep technical descents carry real eccentric load. A 5km segment with 500m of gain and 200m of loss has an effort of 5 + 5 + 1 = 11 effort-km - equivalent to running 11km flat. Time is allocated proportionally to this effort score.

Why gain and loss have asymmetric costs. Minetti et al. (2002) mapped the metabolic cost of inclined locomotion across gradients from -45% to +45%. The key findings: metabolic cost rises steeply above 15-20% uphill grade, making power hiking more energy-efficient than running on steep climbs. On descents, eccentric muscle loading (quads acting as brakes) creates its own metabolic cost - steep technical descents are far more demanding than the same gradient on a smooth fire road. The gain/100 + loss/200 asymmetry in the formula reflects this - gain is more costly per metre than loss, but loss is not free.

Power hiking threshold is flagged at segments where your computed pace exceeds 12 min/km (19 min/mile). This threshold corresponds to the crossover point where walking biomechanics become more efficient than running on steep uphill terrain. Strategic power hiking on marked segments preserves leg muscle for descents and reduces overall race time compared to running everything.

This km-effort model is the same formula used in TrailMath's training engine for load calculation (following Dan Johnston's asymmetric elevation scoring methodology), ensuring consistency between how your training load is measured and how your race effort is planned.

Minetti AE et al. (2002). Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes. J Appl Physiol. 93(3):1039-46. Minetti AE et al. (1995). Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man. J Physiol. 481(Pt 1):235-43. ITRA. km-effort formula. International Trail Running Association. itra.run

Track your ETM 56K plan, crew notes, and live progress in the app

TrailMath uses these models to build periodized plans adjusted to your goals and terrain.

Start free